From 500K to 5K Tokens: The Math Behind Context Compression
Technical deep dive showing real benchmarks of context reduction. Learn how relevance scoring and hybrid search compress 500K tokens to just 5K of highly relevant content.
Alex Lopez
Founder, Snipara
Your LLM doesn't need 500,000 tokens. It needs the right 5,000. Here's the math behind context compression that reduces costs by 90% while improving answer quality.
Key Takeaways
- 90% token reduction — from 500K to ~5K relevant tokens per query
- $4,500/month savings — at 100 queries/day with Claude pricing
- Sub-second latency — hybrid search retrieves context in <1s
- 3-5x more citations — every answer grounded in source docs
The 500K Token Problem
A typical production codebase contains hundreds of thousands of tokens. Here's what we see across real projects:
| Project Type | Files | Raw Tokens | Optimized | Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| React SaaS App | 150+ | ~180K | ~8K | 96% |
| Python Backend | 80+ | ~120K | ~6K | 95% |
| Full-Stack Monorepo | 300+ | ~500K | ~12K | 98% |
Most developers try to feed their entire codebase to Claude or GPT. The result? Blown context windows, hallucinated answers, and API bills that make your CFO nervous.
The Cost of Raw Context
Let's do the math on feeding raw documentation to an LLM:
At 100 queries/day = $150/day = $4,500/month just for input tokens
But that's not the worst part. When you dump 500K tokens into an LLM's context window, you're also getting:
The model invents connections that don't exist
Good luck finding which file the answer came from
More tokens = longer processing time
How Context Compression Works
Context compression isn't about truncating your docs. It's about intelligent selection of the most relevant content.
The Three-Step Pipeline
- Split docs into semantic sections
- Generate embeddings for similarity search
- Keyword search:
auth,login,session - Semantic search: concepts related to authentication
- Score each section by query relevance
- Boost sections with higher citation density
Why Hybrid Search Matters
Pure vector search (embeddings only) misses exact matches. If your code has a function called validateAuthToken(), a semantic search for "authentication" might not find it.
Hybrid search combines:
- Keyword matching — Finds exact terms, function names, class names
- Semantic similarity — Finds conceptually related content
- Reciprocal rank fusion — Merges results from both approaches
Real Benchmarks
Here's what we measured across 50 real projects indexed with Snipara:
Key insight: 90% of your codebase is irrelevant to any single query. Context compression surfaces the 10% that matters.
The RELP Engine: Recursive Context for Complex Queries
Some questions are too complex for a single retrieval pass. "How does the checkout flow handle failed payments and retry logic?" touches multiple files, concepts, and edge cases.
The RELP (Recursive Evaluation Loop Pipeline) engine handles this:
Break query into sub-questions
Get context for each sub-question
Merge results with deduplication
Fit within token limits
This achieves 100x effective context expansion without exceeding token budgets.
Why Grounded Answers Matter
Every answer from compressed context includes citations back to the source documentation. This means:
- Verifiable claims — Click through to see the actual code
- No hallucinations — The model can only cite what exists
- Audit trail — Know exactly where each fact came from
Getting Started
Ready to compress your context? Here's how to try Snipara:
Step 1: Add your MCP configuration
{
"mcpServers": {
"snipara": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://api.snipara.com/mcp/your-project",
"headers": { "X-API-Key": "rlm_..." }
}
}
}Step 2: Start querying
Use rlm_context_query — the primary tool for retrieving optimized context.
Step 3: Watch costs drop
See your token costs decrease while answer quality improves.