Snipara
Menu
Engineering·15 min read

A 14-Phase Workflow for Source-Grounded AI Implementation

Learn how to automate complex multi-phase feature implementations using Snipara + Snipara Sandbox. From database schema to production code: source-grounded context, passing tests, and enforced patterns.

A

Alex Lopez

Founder, Snipara

·
Quick scan
  • Readable in 15 minutes
  • Published 2026-02-11
  • 11 context themes covered
Topics
automationsnipara sandboxsniparamulti phaseimplementationai codingsource groundedclean codedockertestingproduction ready

You have a 14-phase implementation plan. Database schema, API endpoints, authentication, billing integration, admin dashboard, tests, documentation. Snipara can keep each phase grounded in the same project sources, while Snipara Sandbox can run isolated checks. The agent still needs review, permissions, and release gates appropriate to the project.

Key Takeaways

  • Structured execution — Move from a plan to reviewable changes one phase at a time
  • Less context drift — Each phase can query the relevant project sources
  • Test-guided iterations — Failed checks can inform the next revision
  • Visible patterns — Team standards travel with the task as shared context
  • Evidence-first implementation — Real function signatures, not invented APIs

A phased implementation workflow

A complex feature becomes easier to supervise when the plan, project context, isolated execution, and review checkpoints stay connected. This article uses an illustrative billing implementation to show how the pieces can fit together:

📚

Snipara (Context Layer)

  • • Stores your implementation plan
  • • Returns only relevant context per phase
  • • Enforces team coding standards
  • • Provides actual function signatures
⚙️

Snipara Sandbox (Execution Layer)

  • • Executes code in Docker sandbox
  • • Runs tests automatically
  • • Iterates until tests pass
  • • Logs full trajectory for audit

Real Scenario: Building a Multi-Tenant Billing System

Let's walk through automating a complex feature: a complete billing system with Stripe integration for a multi-tenant SaaS application. This involves:

  • Database schema for subscriptions, invoices, and usage tracking
  • Stripe integration with webhook handling
  • Usage-based billing calculations
  • Customer portal and admin dashboard
  • Email notifications for billing events
  • Comprehensive test coverage

The 14-Phase Implementation Plan

PhaseDescriptionEst. TimeDependencies
1Database schema design (Prisma)~15 minNone
2Stripe SDK setup and configuration~10 minPhase 1
3Product and pricing model sync~20 minPhase 2
4Subscription creation flow~25 minPhase 3
5Webhook endpoint + event handling~30 minPhase 4
6Usage tracking service~20 minPhase 1
7Usage-based billing calculations~25 minPhase 5, 6
8Invoice generation~20 minPhase 7
9Payment failure handling~15 minPhase 5
10Customer billing portal~30 minPhase 4
11Admin billing dashboard~35 minPhase 8
12Email notification service~20 minPhase 5, 9
13Integration tests~40 minAll phases
14API documentation~15 minAll phases
Total: ~5.5 hours of automated execution = ~3 weeks of human work

The Automation Architecture

Here's how the system works at a high level:

Step 1: Upload Implementation Plan to Snipara
↓
Step 2: Generate Execution Plan (snipara_plan)
↓
Step 3: Decompose into Chunks (snipara_decompose)
↓
Step 4: For Each Phase: Query Context → Generate → Test → Iterate
↓
Step 5: Complete Feature with All Tests Passing

Step-by-Step: Setting Up Automation

1. Upload Your Implementation Plan

First, upload your feature specification to Snipara:

# Upload the implementation plan
snipara_upload_document(
    path="docs/features/billing-system.md",
    content="""# Multi-Tenant Billing System
## Overview
Complete Stripe integration with usage-based billing...
## Phase 1: Database Schema
- Create Subscription model with Stripe references
- Create Invoice model with line items
- Create UsageRecord model for metered billing
...
"""
)

2. Generate the Execution Plan

# Let Snipara analyze and create optimal execution order
plan = snipara_plan(
    query="Implement billing system from docs/features/billing-system.md",
    max_tokens=16000,
    strategy="relevance_first"  # Prioritize by dependency order
)
Returns: Topologically sorted phases with dependencies

3. Run the Automation Loop

from snipara_sandbox import SniparaSandbox
sandbox = SniparaSandbox(
    backend="anthropic",       # or "openai", "litellm"
    environment="docker",      # Full isolation
    max_depth=5,               # Max iterations per phase
    snipara_api_key="snp-...",
    snipara_project_slug="my-saas"
)
# Execute all phases
for phase in plan["phases"]:
    result = sandbox.completion(f"""
        Execute: {phase['description']}
        Context from Snipara provides:
        - Relevant existing code patterns
        - Team coding standards (MANDATORY rules)
        - Actual function signatures to use
        Tasks:
        1. Write implementation code
        2. Write unit tests
        3. Run tests with pytest
        4. Fix any failures and re-run
        5. Return only when ALL tests pass
    """)
    
    # Save progress for resume capability
    snipara_remember(
        type="context",
        content=f"Phase {phase['id']} complete: {result.summary}"
    )

Quality checkpoints

✓

Source-backed APIs

Snipara returns your actual function signatures. The LLM sees createSubscription(userId, priceId) from your code, not a guessed API.

✓

Team standards in context

Shared context can include coding standards in each phase. The agent and reviewer still verify that the resulting change follows them.

✓

Bounded iterations

A workflow can use failed tests to request another attempt, with an explicit retry limit and a final review of the result.

✓

Review receipts

Managed workflows can retain decisions, handoffs, and verification summaries. Coverage depends on the tools and receipts enabled for that workflow.

This walkthrough is an implementation pattern, not a measured customer result. It does not establish a universal hallucination rate, pass rate, standards-compliance rate, or time saving. Measure those outcomes against your own repository, tests, and review process.

Deep Dive: Phase 5 (Webhook Handling)

Let's look at how one phase actually executes. Phase 5 implements Stripe webhook handling—a complex task requiring security, event routing, and idempotency.

What Snipara Returns (Context)

Query: “Stripe webhook implementation”

1.src/webhooks/stripe.ts:1-45 — Existing webhook structure
2.lib/stripe/client.ts:12-34 — Stripe client initialization
3.CODING_STANDARDS.md — MANDATORY: Verify webhook signatures
4.src/db/queries/subscriptions.ts — Actual DB methods

Total: 4,231 tokens (vs. 180K raw codebase)

The Iteration Loop in Action

Iteration 1

Generated webhook handler → Ran tests → 3 failures: missing signature verification, wrong event types, no idempotency key

Iteration 2

Added signature verification (from CODING_STANDARDS) → 2 failures remaining

Iteration 3

Fixed event type handling → 1 failure: idempotency not implemented

Iteration 4 — SUCCESS

Added idempotency using existing pattern from context → All 12 tests pass ✓

Key insight: The system didn't give up after failures. It used error messages as feedback and fixed issues iteratively—exactly like a human developer would, but in seconds instead of hours.

Production Automation Script

Here's a complete script you can use to automate multi-phase implementations:

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Automated multi-phase implementation with Snipara + Snipara Sandbox"""
import json
import os
from datetime import datetime
from snipara_sandbox import SniparaSandbox
# Configuration
SNIPARA_API_KEY = os.environ["SNIPARA_API_KEY"]
SNIPARA_PROJECT = os.environ["SNIPARA_PROJECT"]
IMPLEMENTATION_DOC = "docs/features/billing-system.md"
def run_automation():
    # Initialize Snipara with Snipara integration
    sandbox = SniparaSandbox(
        backend="anthropic",
        model="claude-sonnet-4-20250514",
        environment="docker",
        max_depth=5,
        snipara_api_key=SNIPARA_API_KEY,
        snipara_project_slug=SNIPARA_PROJECT,
        verbose=True
    )
    # Step 1: Generate execution plan
    plan_result = sandbox.completion(f"""
        Use snipara_plan to create execution plan for:
        {IMPLEMENTATION_DOC}
        
        Return the phases with dependencies as JSON.
    """)
    
    phases = json.loads(plan_result.response)
    print(f"Generated {len(phases)} phases")
    # Step 2: Execute each phase
    results = []
    for i, phase in enumerate(phases, 1):
        print(f"\n{'='*50}")
        print(f"Phase {i}/{len(phases)}: {phase['name']}")
        print(f"{'='*50}")
        
        result = sandbox.completion(f"""
            Execute Phase {i}: {phase['name']}
            
            Description: {phase['description']}
            
            IMPORTANT:
            1. Query Snipara for relevant context FIRST
            2. Follow ALL team coding standards
            3. Write comprehensive tests
            4. Run tests and iterate until ALL pass
            5. Only return success when tests are green
        """)
        
        results.append({
            "phase": i,
            "name": phase['name'],
            "success": result.success,
            "iterations": result.iterations,
            "tokens_used": result.tokens_used
        })
        
        # Store progress for resume capability
        sandbox.completion(f"""
            Use snipara_remember to save:
            Phase {i} ({phase['name']}) completed successfully
            Iterations: {result.iterations}
            category="implementation", type="context"
        """)
    
    # Summary
    print(f"\n{'='*50}")
    print("AUTOMATION COMPLETE")
    print(f"{'='*50}")
    successful = sum(1 for r in results if r['success'])
    print(f"Phases completed: {successful}/{len(phases)}")
    print(f"Total tokens: {sum(r['tokens_used'] for r in results):,}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
    run_automation()

When to Use This Approach

✓ Perfect For

  • • Multi-phase features with clear specifications
  • • CRUD operations and standard patterns
  • • API endpoint implementations
  • • Database migrations with related code
  • • Test suite generation
  • • Documentation generation

⚠ Consider Manual For

  • • Novel algorithms requiring research
  • • Security-critical cryptographic code
  • • Performance-critical hot paths
  • • Highly ambiguous requirements
  • • Integration with undocumented APIs

Cost Breakdown

Running the 14-phase billing system implementation with Claude Sonnet:

ComponentTokensCost
Snipara context queries (14 phases × ~5K)~70,000 input$0.21
LLM input (prompts + context)~200,000 input$0.60
LLM output (code + responses)~150,000 output$2.25
Iteration overhead (~2.5 avg)~100,000 total$0.50
Snipara Pro plan (monthly)—$49.00
Total for feature~520,000~$22.56
Illustrative model-usage estimate: about $23 for this hypothetical run

The Future of Implementation

With Snipara's context optimization and Snipara Sandbox's sandboxed execution, a team can:

  1. Define once — Write your implementation plan as documentation
  2. Automate completely — Let the system execute phases with zero intervention
  3. Trust the output — Every line follows your patterns and passes your tests

The code is clean. The tests pass. The hallucinations are gone. And you didn't write a single line manually.

Ready to automate your next feature?

Start with 1,000 free context queries. Snipara Sandbox is open source.

A

Alex Lopez

Founder, Snipara

Share this article

LinkedInShare
Related reading